Building International Capacity
October 4-7, 2015
Jackson Lake Lodge
Grand Teton, Wyoming USA
Proceedings of the 8th INMM/ESARDA Joint Workshop can be accessed below by clicking on the paper title. Those without links have not provided consent to have their paper published.
Opening Plenary
Working Group 1: Nonproliferation and Nuclear Security
The format for this INMM/ESARDA workshop gives us an opportunity to explore three different aspects of nuclear nonproliferation. The emergent importance of social media will be examined for its implications for nonprofieration. The emergent importance of social media will be examined for its implications for nonproliferation. The important tool of strategic trade controls will be discussed, and we will look to the future to see the architecture for nuclear security after the 2016 nuclear summit.
Working Group 1 Summary
Session A: The Role of Social Media in Nonproliferation and Nuclear Security
- The Case for the Use of Active Social Media in Nonproliferation and Nuclear Security, M. Schanfein, PNNL
- The Role of Social Media in Nonproliferation and Nuclear Security, E. Wolfart, G. Renda, and G. Cojazzi, EC-JRC
- Building Global Nuclear Networks: Enhancing the Value of Social Media in Non-Prolfieration and Nuclear Security, K. Luongo and J. Parker, PGS
- ENEA Activities in the Fields of Nuclear Non-Proliferation, Safeguards, and R&D, G. Giorgiantoni, ENEA
- The Global Diffusion of Societal Verification Tools: A Research Roadmap for a Quantitative Investigation of the Public's Ability to Engage in Citizen Oversight, A. Sayre, S. Kreyling, and C. West, PNNL
Session B: Strategic Trade Controls
- Enhanced Compliance and Dialogue Among Stakeholders, F. Sevini, W. Janssens, EC-JRC
- The Overlapping Safeguards and Export Control Benefits of International Outreach Focusing on IAEA Model Additional Protocol (AP), Annexes 1 and 2, T. Perry, DOE/NNSA
- An Integrated Approach to Stopping Illicit Nuclear Technology Procurement, M. Bunn, Belfer Center
- Enterprise Outreach on Strategic Trade Control Compliance: Overview, A. Fullenwider, ANL
Session C: Sustainable Nuclear Security after the 2016 Summit
Working Group 2: Arms Control
In today's complex national security arena, it is envisioned that a systematic approach could help to identify key area in a national nuclear weapons enterprise where increased transparency or effective verification would provide the greatest confidence for future arms control commitments. The essential balancing act is to allow for sufficient transparency with adequate protection of sensitive information. The group will consider how systems analysis can help drive the development of the methodologies and novel technologies that could be accepted by treaty partners given national security constraints.
Working Group 2 Summary
Session A: Novel Technologies for Arms Control Verification
Session B: Balancing Transparency vs. Protection of Sensitive Information
Session C: Systems Concept to Arms Control Verification
- EURATOM Safeguards Experience and Future Verification Regimes, P. Schwalbach, EC-EURATOM
- Systems Concept to Arms Control Verification, I. Niemeyer, Juelich, A. Rezniczek, UBA GmbH, and G. Stein, Consultant
- Developing a Systems Approach to Arms Control Verification, C. Chen, M. Dreicer, D. Prosnitz, LLNL; K. Allen, AWE, I. Niemeyer, C. Listner, Juelich, and G. Stein, Consultant
- Systems Engineering and the Design of Arms Control Monitoring Regimes, S. DeLand, J. Brotz, and P. Marleau, SNL
- Enterprise Monitoring of Declared Warhead Movements-A Novel Systems Level Approach to Arms Control Verification, J. Benz, PNNL
Working Group 3: International Safeguards
For over 30 years international safeguards has been continually developing and strengthening approaches and methodologies. The integration of current and emerging technologies can expand on applicable methods for both the verification of declared and the detection of undeclared nuclear activities. However, further discussion is required on the development of metrics for the evaluation of methods applied for the detection of undeclared nuclear activities. Additionally, consideration needs to be paid to building public confidence in these methods and their detection capabilities. This can only be achieved through openness and transparency.
Working Group 3 Summary
Session A: Developing Metrics for the Detection and Evaluation of Undeclared Nuclear Activities
- Developing Metrics for the Detection and Evaluation of Undeclared Nuclear Activities, B. Moran, NRC
- The Development of Process Models for Clandestine Proliferation, N. Kyriakopoulos, GWU
- Developing Metrics for the Detection and Evaluation of Undeclared Nuclear Activities, I. Niemeyer, Juelich, A. Rezniczek, UBA GmbH, and G. Stein, Consultant
- Performance Measures for Safeguards at the State Level, M. Goodman, State Department
Session B: The Integration of Emerging Technologies for Safeguards
- The Integration of Emerging Technologies for Safeguards, M. Koskelo and S. Kadner, Aquila
- The Integration of Emerging Technologies for Safeguards, J. Truyens, P. Schillebeeckx, S. Richter, Y. Aregbe, K. Mayer, and M. Hedberg, EC-EURATOM
- Development of an Array of CZT Detectors for Safeguards Application, SW Kwak, S. Park, and H. Chung, KINAC
- Final Disposal Technologies, C. Koutsoyannopoulos, M. Murtezi, and P. Schwallbach, EC-EURATOM
- Cyber Security Risks in Emerging and Integrated Technologies, D. Blair, F. McCrory, and G. Kao, SNL
- UV-VIS-NIR as an In-Process Monitoring Tool, J. Disser, INL, B. Cipiti, SNL, L. Ticknore, LANL, M. Schanfein, and S. Bryan, PNNL
- Advanced Analytics for International Safeguards, M. Thomas, Z. Gastelum, and S. Kubica, SNL
- Synthetic Particles for Micro-Particle Analysis-Paving the Way to Safeguards Applications, M. Duerr, Juelich
- The Benefits of the Signature-Based Safeguards Approach, D. Rappleye, E. Blandford, and M. Simpson, University of Utah
- Neutron Resonance Densitometry (NRD); Ready for Practical Use, M. Seya, H. Harada, M. Koizumi, JH. Tuchiya, JAEA; S. Aboushal, J. Heyse, S. Kopecky, C. Paradela, and P. Schillebeeckx, EC-JRC
- A New Approach to Enrichment Plant UF6 Destructive Assay Sample Collection and Analysis, N. Anheier, B. Cannon, A. Martinez, C. Barrett, M. Taubman, K. Anderson, and L. Smith, PNNL
- Technologies for Safeguards Cannot Rely on the Commercial Sector, G. Baldwin, R. Haddal, H. Smartt, and M. Thomas, SNL
Session C: Building Confidence Through Transparency and Public Opinion
- Building Confidence Through Transparency and Public Opinion, B. Moran, NRC
- Building Confidence through Transparency, Public Opinion, and Integration of Existing and Emerging Technologies, O. Okku and E. Martikka, STUK
- EURATOM Safeguards: Building Confidence Through Transparency, P. Meylemans, EC-EURATOM
- Safeguards Accountability and Transparency-Essential Elements of Public Confidence, C. Everton, ASNO
Working Group 4: Education and Training
This working group will address the infrastructure and interdisciplinary requirements for effective education and training and innovative technologies that are being investigated and introduced for improved results and efficiency. This will address both academia and professionals in different stages of their career. Attention will also be paid to integration with other E&T in the nuclear and related fields.
Session A: Educational Infrastructure and Centers of Excellence
Session B: Interdisciplinary Requirements for Nonproliferation Education
- Interdisciplinary Requirements for Nonproliferation Education, B. Moran, NRC
- ENEA Activities in the Fields of Nuclear Non-Proliferation, Safeguards, and R&D, G. Giorgiantoni, ENEA
- ORNL: Reaching out to Future Analysts and Policy Makers, K. Gilligan, ORNL
- International Safeguards and Nuclear Security Synergies Built on an Academic Foundation, N. Peter-Stein and H. Hall, University of Tennessee
- Interdisciplinary Requirements for Non-Proliferation Education, S. Aghara and M. Marzo, UMass-Lowell-INSSL
Session C: Innovative Technologies for Education and Training
|
Print Page